After reading my pan of Sidney Lumet's new movie, Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, along with the many, many raves about it, a friend wrote to say:
What's wrong with these fucking people? I feel like A.O. Scott & David Denby (and while I have my misgivings about each, they're not idiots)
just bought the package, perhaps literally sight unseen: It's "serious,"
it's "drama," it has these supposedly classical origins, it's
got a few
pomo trappings but its feet are in honorable old Hollywood, the director
is a "mensch" (give me a break with the patronizing Yiddishisms, Tony).
I was literally shocked to see the film after reading all the raves
about it. I'm glad not to be alone, but it makes me profoundly depressed
about the lack of discrimination. I'm wondering if these are the same
people who go on and on at parties about how great Philip Roth is.
You were too nice to say this directly, but most of Lumet's films are
completely leaden — and all of them in the last 25 years. The only
times in Lumet's long career when his methods have produced something
that wasn't completely boring have been when he was given an exceptional
screenplay (notably by Chayefsky). Even with that, I'm not sure how
Network would play after all these years. I watched Serpico at some
point in the 90s and found it entertaining in the manner of a 2-hour
Kojak episode. Dog Day Afternoon and The Verdict I definitely admire,
although, again, I haven't seen them for a long time. I can pretty much
guarantee that 12 Angry Men would seem unwatchable.
Once I realized how bad the movie was going to be, I found myself
actually pining for Quentin Tarantino. If I begged God to turn this
movie into Jackie Brown, would he oblige? Sidney Lumet has never IN HIS
LIFE directed a scene as good as the one between De Niro and Sam Jackson
in the LAX-vicinity bar in Jackie Brown.
What are your thoughts, dear readers?